Charlie and the Chocolate Factory

Here is something I wrote for Film Analysis I in the past summer. Just crap...

チャーリーとチョコレート工場

　　貧しい家に、少年チャーリーは失業中の父親と母親、そして寝たきり４人の老人で暮らしていた。彼のおじいさんは昔、近くにある世界一大きなチョコレート工場で働いたことがあった。お菓子作りの天才ウィリー・ウォンかは工場の持ち主であった。彼は五枚のゴールデン・チケットを用意して、チョコレートからチケットを得た子供たちは彼の工場を参観することができると公表した。ラッキなチャーリーは最後のゴールデン・チケットを得た。おじいさんとともに工場に行った。ほかの８人の子供と親は皆人に嫌がられる人だった。そして、工場で不思議なことは次から次へと起こった。。。

　　原作を読んだことはないが、ティム・バートンとジョニー・デップのコンビに期待をかけたからその映画を見た。ティム・バートンは一貫した風格を保つ。濃い色彩、風変わりの人物、非現実のストーリ、優越な想像力で夢想的世界を作り出した。子供向けの世界というより、ブラックユーモアが溢れる「大人の童話」だ。このスタイルに見慣れない友達は「なぜそんな仕方で悪い子を懲らしめるのか」と聞いた。私もその場面は子供にとって少し怖くないかと思ってる。にもかかわらず、私は歓声を上げる焼ける人形を見るとき、何となく痛快な気分になった。

　　小賢しい子供たちを連れて行くたびに、同じ顔をしているウンパ・ルンパたちは自作の歌とダンスを上演した。面白い装いとスタイルはやや古風で、なんのバンドを思わせた。しかし、四回も繰り返して、クリーシェイになってしまった。しかも、その意味深い歌詞は訳されなかったから、やや残念だと思う。

　　映画中のやんちゃな子供たちは悪い手本として、良い価値を伝える。チャーリーの家庭は貧乏だが、家族の皆は楽しそうに生きていた。チャーリーのおかけで、ウォンかも長年振りの父親と仲直りをした。それを見ると、観客もほっと安心した。

　　「ビッグ・フィッシュ」ほど胸を打たれないが、音楽と映像とジョニーの演技を楽しんでもけっこう満足だろう。

-Vampire- Interview with the Vampire (1994) *转贴*

　　1975年，小说《夜访吸血鬼》刚刚出版，其影片拍摄权就立即被人买走。然而直到1994 年，小说才终于被尼尔.乔丹搬上了银幕。这期间，足足经过了20年的时光和无数次的修改与完善。令制作者们心慰的是，影片一经推出，就引起了巨大的反响，可谓好评如潮，而导演尼尔.乔丹的才华和实力也得以再次充分展现，并从此广为人知。



Interview with the Vampire
A Film Review by James Berardinelli

United States, 1994
U.S. Release Date: 11/11/94
Running Length: 2:02
MPAA Classification: R (Violence, gore, mature themes, nudity)

Cast: Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, Kirsten Dunst, Antonio Bandaras, Christian Slater, Stephen Rea Director: Neil Jordan
Screenplay: Anne Rice based on her novel
Cinematography: Philippe Rousselot
Music: Elliot Goldenthal
U.S. Distributor: Warner Brothers

When Interview with the Vampire works, it's as compelling and engrossing a piece of entertainment as is available on film today. When it falters, the weaknesses seem magnified. Fortunately, under the care of director Neil Jordan (The Crying Game), instances of the former are more frequent that those of the latter, although the film noticeably stumbles during two key sequences (a needlessly drawn-out exploration of life as a vampire in Paris and the illogical, dumb conclusion). Despite the ups and downs of the second half, however, the first hour is classic horror at its most grotesque. In the best tradition of the Grand Guignol, Interview with the Vampire revels in its graphic and horrifying bloodiness.

Tom Cruise's Lestat is not a consistent villain, nor does he come across as particularly multi- dimensional, but there are times when his screen presence commands attention. More effective is Brad Pitt's Louis, who captures the audience's sympathy by fighting against losing his conscience (although his constant wallowing in self-pity becomes tiresome). Most arresting of all is young Kirsten Dunst, whose charisma is such that she continually steals scenes from her older and more experienced co-stars. Also featured are Antonio Bandaras (as the ancient vampire Armand), Stephen Rea (in what is little more than a cameo), and Christian Slater.

As is true of many vampire stories, there is an erotic undercurrent to Interview. Here, explicitness is replaced by innuendo. While sex is rarely in the background, it's never on screen, either. Homoeroticism, the Electra Complex, and pedophilia are all hinted at.

As horror films go, Interview with the Vampire has the right look. Atmosphere may not be everything, but its importance cannot be understated. With its gothic settings, superlative makeup (by Stan Winston), and sterling miniatures work, this film can claim visuals nearly on par with those of Kenneth Branagh's stylish Frankenstein. There are other parallels between these films, not the least of which is their equally erratic pacing. However, Interview's plot is probably more coherent and its characters somewhat better realized. There are flaws to be found here -- even for those not specifically looking -- but for the simple horrific pleasure offered, they can be set aside, if not entirely ignored.

http://movie-reviews.colossus.net/movies/i/interview.html


A Review by ROGER EBERT

Although one of the characters in "Interview with the Vampire" begs to be transformed into a vampire, and eagerly awaits the doom of immortality, the movie never makes vampirism look like anything but an endless sadness. That is its greatest strength. Vampires throughout movie history have often chortled as if they'd gotten away with something. But the first great vampire movie, "Nosferatu" (1922), knew better, and so does this one.

The movie is true to the detailed vision that has informed all of Anne Rice's novels, and which owes much to the greater taste for realism which has crept into modern horror fiction. It is a film about what it might really be like to be a vampire. The title sets the tone, and in the opening scenes, set in San Francisco, the 200-year-old vampire Louis de Pointe du Lac (Brad Pitt) submits to an interview by a modern journalist (Christian Slater), just as any serial killer or terrorist bomber might sit down to talk to "60 Minutes." His story begins in the late 1700s, in New Orleans, that peculiar city where even today all things seem possible, and where, after losing his wife and daughter, he threw himself into a life of grief and debauchery. His path crossed that of the vampire Lestat (Tom Cruise), who transformed him into a vampire, and ever since he has wandered the world's great cities, feeding on the blood of his victims.

The initial meeting be tween Louis and Lestat takes the form of a seduction; the vampire seems to be courting the younger man, and there is a strong element of homoeroticism in the way the neck is bared and the blood is engorged. Parallels between vampirism and sex, both gay and straight, are always there in all of Rice's novels; the good news is that you can indulge your lusts night after night, but the bad news is that if you stop, you die.

Tom Cruise, who initially seemed to many people an unlikely choice to play Lestat, is never less than convincing, and his slight British accent, combined with makeup that is dramatic without being obtrusive, disguises the clean-cut star - makes him seem unwholesome in an odd, insinuating way. Brad Pitt, whose role is probably larger, and who has been at home as the depraved hero of films like "Kalifornia," here seems more like an innocent, a young man who makes unwise choices, and lives (and lives, and lives) to regret them.



One of the creepier aspects of the story is the creation of the child vampire, Claudia, played by Kirsten Dunst, who is about 12 years old. The character was six in the novel, but even twice as old she is disturbing, trapped in her child's body as she ages, decade after decade. Dunst, perhaps with the help of Stan Winston's subtle makeup, is somehow able to convey the notion of great age inside apparent youth.

The movie's unique glory is in its look, created by cinematographer Phillipe Rousselot and production designer by Dante Ferretti. His credits include Scorsese's "The Age of Innocence" and Gilliam's "The Adventures of Baron Munchausen," and here he combines the elegance of the former and the fantastic images of the latter into a vampire world of eerie beauty. The action of course largely takes place at night, in old Southern plantations and French Quarter dives, along gloomy back streets and in decadent boudoirs. The film truly takes flight after the action moves on board a transatlantic sailing ship, and then into the catacombs of Paris. There are scenes set in a vast underground columbarium, where the vampires sleep on shelves reaching up into the gloom, that is one of the great sets of movie history.

In Paris, Louis meets the vampires Armand (Antonio Banderas) and Santiago (Stephen Rea), and begins to understand he is a member of an international clandestine society. Vampires of course need regular supplies of fresh blood, and the details involving its procurement are dismaying to the creatures, who, to live, must constantly feed off the lives of others. Their sadness is manifest in Rice's screenplay and the moody direction by Neil Jordan ("The Crying Game"). Both Rice and Jordan take this subject, with its abundant possibilities for looking ridiculous, and play it as tragedy.

Although much has been said about the film's level of violence (and although the R rating is quite correct), those who have seen other horror films will not be particularly shocked.
My complaint about the film is that not very much happens, in the plot sense. The movie is more about the history and reality of vampirism than about specific events, although some action does center around the fate(s) of Lestat. A stronger plot engine might have drawn us more quickly to the end, but on a scene by scene basis, "Interview with the Vampire" is a skillful exercise in macabre imagination.

写在最前面

在这里我会写一些，或者转贴有关电影的文章。
当然，我也会介绍一些关于我所喜欢的音乐或文学。